MAULI BAHU-UDDESHIYA SAMAJIK SANSTHA, KONDALA, THR. CHAIRMAN/PRESIDENT, RAVINDRA L. BUNDHE vs THE STATE OF MAHA., THR. PRIN. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION, MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/2776/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM040110982026

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/7603/2026

Filing Date

30-03-2026

Registration No

WP/2776/2026

Registration Date

04-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016(Mah. Act No. Vi of 2017)

Petitioner(s)

MAULI BAHU-UDDESHIYA SAMAJIK SANSTHA, KONDALA, THR. CHAIRMAN/PRESIDENT, RAVINDRA L. BUNDHE

Adv. A.I. SHEIKH,NAQUID Z. MIRZA,NAQUID Z. MIRZA, ,NAQUID Z. MIRZA

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHA., THR. PRIN. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION, MUMBAI AND ORS.

SMT. NATHIBAI DAMODHAR TAHAKERSEY (S.N.D.T.) WOMENS UNIVERSITY, THR. REGISTRAR

MANDVE RISHI BAHU-UDDESHIYA SANSTHA, MANDVA, WASHIM, THR. PRESIDENT CHAIRMAN

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

18-04-2026
10-06-2026

FRESH ADMISSION (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS)

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Summary The Writ Petition was adjourned to 22.04.2026. The court issued notice to respondents (with the State waiving notice), permitted the petitioner to serve remaining respondents by private mode, and directed filing of an affidavit by the next date or face a Rs. 500 cost deposit penalty. Office objections were to be resolved before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Writ Petition was adjourned to 22.04.2026. The court issued notice to respondents (with the State waiving notice), permitted the petitioner to serve remaining respondents by private mode, and directed filing of an affidavit by the next date or face a Rs. 500 cost deposit penalty. Office objections were to be resolved before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case