MAULI BAHU-UDDESHIYA SAMAJIK SANSTHA, KONDALA, THR. CHAIRMAN/PRESIDENT, RAVINDRA L. BUNDHE vs THE STATE OF MAHA., THR. PRIN. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION, MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/2776/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040110982026
Filing Number
WP/7603/2026
Filing Date
30-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/2776/2026
Registration Date
04-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAULI BAHU-UDDESHIYA SAMAJIK SANSTHA, KONDALA, THR. CHAIRMAN/PRESIDENT, RAVINDRA L. BUNDHE
Adv. A.I. SHEIKH,NAQUID Z. MIRZA,NAQUID Z. MIRZA, ,NAQUID Z. MIRZA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHA., THR. PRIN. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION, MUMBAI AND ORS.
-
2.SMT. NATHIBAI DAMODHAR TAHAKERSEY (S.N.D.T.) WOMENS UNIVERSITY, THR. REGISTRAR
-
3.MANDVE RISHI BAHU-UDDESHIYA SANSTHA, MANDVA, WASHIM, THR. PRESIDENT CHAIRMAN
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
Fresh Admission (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
-
18-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
Summary The Writ Petition was adjourned to 22.04.2026. The court issued notice to respondents (with the State waiving notice), permitted the petitioner to serve remaining respondents by private mode, and directed filing of an affidavit by the next date or face a Rs. 500 cost deposit penalty. Office objections were to be resolved before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2776/2026
Summary The Writ Petition was adjourned to 22.04.2026. The court issued notice to respondents (with the State waiving notice), permitted the petitioner to serve remaining respondents by private mode, and directed filing of an affidavit by the next date or face a Rs. 500 cost deposit penalty. Office objections were to be resolved before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts