NOOR JAHANBANO HAJI IBRAHIM FAZLANI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF CO-OPERATION, MUMBAI AND OTHERS — WP/2775/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM040110672026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

18th April 2026

Filing Number

WP/7578/2026

Filing Date

27-03-2026

Registration No

WP/2775/2026

Registration Date

04-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act

Petitioner(s)

NOOR JAHANBANO HAJI IBRAHIM FAZLANI

Adv. SWAPNIL SURESH SHINGANE

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF CO-OPERATION, MUMBAI AND OTHERS

DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, NAGPUR CITY

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, NAGPUR CITY 3 AND LIQUIDATOR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

18-04-2026

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Summary The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the writ petition and directed respondents 2 and 3 to decide the petitioner's representation dated 07/11/2025 within eight weeks, with the decision to be communicated within two weeks thereafter. The court found that sufficient time had lapsed since the representation's submission and issued this direction to expedite the pending administrative decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the writ petition and directed respondents 2 and 3 to decide the petitioner's representation dated 07/11/2025 within eight weeks, with the decision to be communicated within two weeks thereafter. The court found that sufficient time had lapsed since the representation's submission and issued this direction to expedite the pending administrative decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Constitution of India Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case