NOOR JAHANBANO HAJI IBRAHIM FAZLANI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF CO-OPERATION, MUMBAI AND OTHERS — WP/2775/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM040110672026

Filing Number

WP/7578/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/2775/2026

Registration Date

04-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NOOR JAHANBANO HAJI IBRAHIM FAZLANI

    Adv. SWAPNIL SURESH SHINGANE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF CO-OPERATION, MUMBAI AND OTHERS

  2. 2.DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, NAGPUR CITY

  3. 3.ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, NAGPUR CITY 3 AND LIQUIDATOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    —

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the writ petition and directed respondents 2 and 3 to decide the petitioner's representation dated 07/11/2025 within eight weeks, with the decision to be communicated within two weeks thereafter. The court found that sufficient time had lapsed since the representation's submission and issued this direction to expedite the pending administrative decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2775/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the writ petition and directed respondents 2 and 3 to decide the petitioner's representation dated 07/11/2025 within eight weeks, with the decision to be communicated within two weeks thereafter. The court found that sufficient time had lapsed since the representation's submission and issued this direction to expedite the pending administrative decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case