KAMAL INDERLAL THARANI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS RAMDASPETH, DIST. AKOLA AND ANR Advocate - PARITA N. LAKHANI, APPOINTED FOR VICTIM — BA/432/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (cr.pc) Section 439. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM040109342026

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

Filing Number

BA/3450/2026

Filing Date

27-03-2026

Registration No

BA/432/2026

Registration Date

27-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. NERLIKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. NERLIKAR

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

BAIL/INTERIM BAIL ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.PC) Section 439
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Indian Penal Code (I.P.C) Section 370(A),372,376,376(2)(n),R/W34
Supression of Immoral Traffic in Women,Girls Act Section 3,4,5,7
Protection of Children from Sexual offence Act 2012 Section 4,5(n),6,8,16,17

Petitioner(s)

KAMAL INDERLAL THARANI

Adv. SANGRAM VIKAS SIRPURKAR,DR. RENUKA SANGRAM SIRPURKAR,DR. RENUKA SANGRAM SIRPURKAR, ,DR. RENUKA SANGRAM SIRPURKAR

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS (Police Station) RAMDASPETH, DIST. AKOLA AND ANR Advocate - PARITA N. LAKHANI, APPOINTED FOR VICTIM

CHANDRAKALA MESARE

XYZ (VICTIM) IN CRIME NO. 234/2024

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. NERLIKAR

01-04-2026
18-06-2026

BA (AFTER NOTICE)

07-05-2026

BA (AFTER NOTICE)

29-04-2026

BA (AFTER NOTICE)

15-04-2026

BA (FRESH)

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. NERLIKAR

Case Summary: BA/432/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned to 18.06.2026. Advocate Ms. P.N. Lakhani appointed to represent the victim who failed to appear despite being served. The High Court directed notification to the Legal Aid Sub Committee accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: BA/432/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned to 18.06.2026. Advocate Ms. P.N. Lakhani appointed to represent the victim who failed to appear despite being served. The High Court directed notification to the Legal Aid Sub Committee accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case