DINESH S/O. PRALHADRAO PAWAR vs S. T. CASTE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, AMRAVATI, THR. MEMBER SECRETARY — WP/3659/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 11th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM040108232026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

16th May 2026

Filing Number

WP/7411/2026

Filing Date

26-03-2026

Registration No

WP/3659/2026

Registration Date

29-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE , HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE , HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

11th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
S.c. & S.t. Orders (Amendment) Act

Petitioner(s)

DINESH S/O. PRALHADRAO PAWAR

Adv. ANKUSH PRABHAKARRAO KALMEGH,SAURAV MAHADEORAO GOLHAR,SAURAV MAHADEORAO GOLHAR, ,SAURAV MAHADEORAO GOLHAR

Respondent(s)

S. T. CASTE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, AMRAVATI, THR. MEMBER SECRETARY

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE , HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA

16-05-2026

Orders

11-06-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE,HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA

Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the writ petition by directing the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati to decide the petitioner Dinesh's caste claim within three months. The government agreed to this timeline, and the court granted the narrowly tailored relief sought without substantive adjudication on the merits of the caste claim itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the writ petition by directing the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati to decide the petitioner Dinesh's caste claim within three months. The government agreed to this timeline, and the court granted the narrowly tailored relief sought without substantive adjudication on the merits of the caste claim itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case