DINESH S/O. PRALHADRAO PAWAR vs S. T. CASTE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, AMRAVATI, THR. MEMBER SECRETARY — WP/3659/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-May-2026

CNR: HCBM040108232026

Filing Number

WP/7411/2026

Filing Date

26-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/3659/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
S.c. & S.t. Orders (Amendment) Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DINESH S/O. PRALHADRAO PAWAR

    Adv. ANKUSH PRABHAKARRAO KALMEGH,SAURAV MAHADEORAO GOLHAR,SAURAV MAHADEORAO GOLHAR, ,SAURAV MAHADEORAO GOLHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S. T. CASTE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, AMRAVATI, THR. MEMBER SECRETARY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the writ petition by directing the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati to decide the petitioner Dinesh's caste claim within three months. The government agreed to this timeline, and the court granted the narrowly tailored relief sought without substantive adjudication on the merits of the caste claim itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-May-2026

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3659/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the writ petition by directing the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati to decide the petitioner Dinesh's caste claim within three months. The government agreed to this timeline, and the court granted the narrowly tailored relief sought without substantive adjudication on the merits of the caste claim itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case