SHRI. MOTIRAM S/O. TIMAJI PISE vs RAJKUMAR WAMAN SHELKE — CAC/26/2026

Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 29-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM040108142026

Filing Number

CAC/7404/2026

Filing Date

26-Mar-2026

Registration No

CAC/26/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Act Section 00

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI. MOTIRAM S/O. TIMAJI PISE

    Adv. SANDEEP NARESH SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJKUMAR WAMAN SHELKE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo JoshiView PDF

    Summary of CAC/26/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed the application filed by the legal representatives of deceased petitioner Motiram S/o Timaji Pise to be brought on record in the civil revision application against Rajkumar Waman Shelke. The court held that the three-year limitation period applies to substituting legal representatives in civil revision applications, not the ninety-day period applicable to civil suits or appeals, and found the application was filed within the prescribed limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAC/26/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CAC/26/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed the application filed by the legal representatives of deceased petitioner Motiram S/o Timaji Pise to be brought on record in the civil revision application against Rajkumar Waman Shelke. The court held that the three-year limitation period applies to substituting legal representatives in civil revision applications, not the ninety-day period applicable to civil suits or appeals, and found the application was filed within the prescribed limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case