SHRI. MOTIRAM S/O. TIMAJI PISE vs RAJKUMAR WAMAN SHELKE — CAC/25/2026

Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: --C.A. Disposed off on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 29-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM040108132026

Filing Number

CAC/7403/2026

Filing Date

26-Mar-2026

Registration No

CAC/25/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--C.A. Disposed off

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Act Section 00

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI. MOTIRAM S/O. TIMAJI PISE

    Adv. SANDEEP NARESH SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJKUMAR WAMAN SHELKE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    —

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo JoshiView PDF

    Case Summary: CAC /25/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) addressed two applications following the death of applicant Shri Motiram on 20.02.2025. In CAC No.25/2026, the court clarified that the three-year limitation period (not 90 days) applies for substituting legal representatives in civil revision applications, and disposed of the condonation application as not pressed. In CAC No.26/2026, the court allowed the application to bring legal representatives on record and directed amendments by 30.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAC/25/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CAC /25/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) addressed two applications following the death of applicant Shri Motiram on 20.02.2025. In CAC No.25/2026, the court clarified that the three-year limitation period (not 90 days) applies for substituting legal representatives in civil revision applications, and disposed of the condonation application as not pressed. In CAC No.26/2026, the court allowed the application to bring legal representatives on record and directed amendments by 30.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case