KAILAS S/O SURYABHAN ATRAM vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS MAREGAON DIST. YAVATMAL AND ANR Advocate - AARZOO GUGLANI — BA/433/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (cr.pc) Section 439. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF AS A WITHDRAWN on 29th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM040106712026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

01st April 2026

Filing Number

BA/3361/2026

Filing Date

25-03-2026

Registration No

BA/433/2026

Registration Date

27-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. NERLIKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. NERLIKAR

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

BAIL/INTERIM BAIL ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

29th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF AS A WITHDRAWN

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.PC) Section 439
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64,96
Protection of Children from Sexual offence Act 2012 Section 4,6

Petitioner(s)

KAILAS S/O SURYABHAN ATRAM

Adv. MOHD FARAZ JAMIL,AKASH RAMESH PIMPLE,AKASH RAMESH PIMPLE, ,ANAND NAGORAO SHINDE,AKASH RAMESH PIMPLE

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS (Police Station) MAREGAON DIST. YAVATMAL AND ANR Advocate - AARZOO GUGLANI

XYZ, IN CRIME NO. 0328/2025 REGISTERED BY MAREGAON PS (Police Station) DIST. YAVATMAL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. NERLIKAR

01-04-2026
29-04-2026

BA (AFTER NOTICE)

15-04-2026

BA (FRESH)

Orders

29-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. NERLIKAR

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of Kailash Atram's criminal application by permitting withdrawal with liberty to refile before the Trial Court if the trial remains unconclusive within nine months. The Court found no grounds to grant relief on the merits and requested the Trial Court to conclude proceedings within nine months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of Kailash Atram's criminal application by permitting withdrawal with liberty to refile before the Trial Court if the trial remains unconclusive within nine months. The Court found no grounds to grant relief on the merits and requested the Trial Court to conclude proceedings within nine months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case