KAILAS S/O SURYABHAN ATRAM vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS MAREGAON DIST. YAVATMAL AND ANR Advocate - AARZOO GUGLANI — BA/433/2026
Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 439. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF AS A WITHDRAWN on 29th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM040106712026
Filing Number
BA/3361/2026
Filing Date
25-Mar-2026
Registration No
BA/433/2026
Registration Date
27-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
BAIL/INTERIM BAIL ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
29-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF AS A WITHDRAWN
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KAILAS S/O SURYABHAN ATRAM
Adv. MOHD FARAZ JAMIL,AKASH RAMESH PIMPLE,AKASH RAMESH PIMPLE, ,ANAND NAGORAO SHINDE,AKASH RAMESH PIMPLE
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS (Police Station) MAREGAON DIST. YAVATMAL AND ANR Advocate - AARZOO GUGLANI
-
2.XYZ, IN CRIME NO. 0328/2025 REGISTERED BY MAREGAON PS (Police Station) DIST. YAVATMAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of Kailash Atram's criminal application by permitting withdrawal with liberty to refile before the Trial Court if the trial remains unconclusive within nine months. The Court found no grounds to grant relief on the merits and requested the Trial Court to conclude proceedings within nine months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Ba (After Notice)
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
Ba (Fresh)
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar
-
01-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BA/433/2026
The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of Kailash Atram's criminal application by permitting withdrawal with liberty to refile before the Trial Court if the trial remains unconclusive within nine months. The Court found no grounds to grant relief on the merits and requested the Trial Court to conclude proceedings within nine months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts