SANTOSH S/O PRABHAKAR DHAKATE vs SMT. MUKTABAI WD/O RAMBHAU CHAUDHARI AND OTHERS Advocate - GIRISH G. KANDHARI — CAF/1458/2026

Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM040104822026

Filing Number

CAF/7176/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

CAF/1458/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Act Section 00

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANTOSH S/O PRABHAKAR DHAKATE

    Adv. VISHIKH V. DHANDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. MUKTABAI WD/O RAMBHAU CHAUDHARI AND OTHERS Advocate - GIRISH G. KANDHARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF

    Case Summary: CAF/1458/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed respondents 1-4's application to withdraw compensation deposited by appellant Santosh Dhakate in the pending First Appeal. Although respondents had previously stated they wouldn't withdraw the amount (02.02.2026), they later sought withdrawal due to financial need. The court permitted withdrawal of 50% of the appellant's deposited amount plus accrued interest, subject to furnishing an undertaking, considering the funds were compensation meant for original claimants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Apr-2026

    —

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAF/1458/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CAF/1458/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed respondents 1-4's application to withdraw compensation deposited by appellant Santosh Dhakate in the pending First Appeal. Although respondents had previously stated they wouldn't withdraw the amount (02.02.2026), they later sought withdrawal due to financial need. The court permitted withdrawal of 50% of the appellant's deposited amount plus accrued interest, subject to furnishing an undertaking, considering the funds were compensation meant for original claimants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case