BHAGYASHREE PRAFUL BOKADE vs PRAFUL VINODRAO BOKADE Advocate - DEWANG DEEPAK VAIDYA, ,APARNA D. VAIDYA — MCA/208/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040103342026
e-Filing Number
18-03-2026
Filing Number
MCA/7080/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
MCA/208/2026
Registration Date
25-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
Bench Type
Single
Category
TRANSFER OF CASES WITH IN THE STATE ( 59 )
Sub-Category
SUBORDINATE COURTS ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHAGYASHREE PRAFUL BOKADE
Adv. RAJAT KUMAR MAHESHWARI,DHIRAJKUMAR R. LAL,DHIRAJKUMAR R. LAL, ,DHIRAJKUMAR R. LAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRAFUL VINODRAO BOKADE Advocate - DEWANG DEEPAK VAIDYA, ,APARNA D. VAIDYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo JoshiView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) granted the wife's application to transfer her husband's restitution of conjugal rights petition (HMP No.341 of 2024) from Wardha to Umred court. The court found it expedient to transfer the case considering the 2-year-old child resides with the applicant/wife and she lacks income and maintenance support. The court also allowed the husband to appear via video-conferencing if requested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
For Orders-
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
-
14-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo JoshiView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCA/208/2026
The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) granted the wife's application to transfer her husband's restitution of conjugal rights petition (HMP No.341 of 2024) from Wardha to Umred court. The court found it expedient to transfer the case considering the 2-year-old child resides with the applicant/wife and she lacks income and maintenance support. The court also allowed the husband to appear via video-conferencing if requested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts