SHRI. PRASHANT DNYANESHWAR KOLHE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. MINISTER, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/2887/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed-Off on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM040102572026

Filing Number

WP/7008/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/2887/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed-Off

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Bombay Village Panchayat Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI. PRASHANT DNYANESHWAR KOLHE

    Adv. BHOJRAJ SITARAM DHANDALE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. MINISTER, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS.

  2. 2.THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, NAGPUR

  3. 3.THE ZILLA PARISHAD, CHANDRAPUR, THR. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CHANDRAPUR

  4. 4.THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, CHIMUR

  5. 5.PRIYANKA SACHIN THAMKE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench disposed of the writ petition after the State of Maharashtra's Assistant Government Pleader undertook to decide the appeal against the Additional Commissioner's order under Section 39(3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 within four weeks. The Court accepted this undertaking and disposed of the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2887/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench disposed of the writ petition after the State of Maharashtra's Assistant Government Pleader undertook to decide the appeal against the Additional Commissioner's order under Section 39(3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 within four weeks. The Court accepted this undertaking and disposed of the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case