SHRI. PRASHANT DNYANESHWAR KOLHE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. MINISTER, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/2887/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed-Off on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM040102572026
Filing Number
WP/7008/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/2887/2026
Registration Date
07-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed-Off
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRI. PRASHANT DNYANESHWAR KOLHE
Adv. BHOJRAJ SITARAM DHANDALE
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. MINISTER, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS.
-
2.THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, NAGPUR
-
3.THE ZILLA PARISHAD, CHANDRAPUR, THR. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CHANDRAPUR
-
4.THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, CHIMUR
-
5.PRIYANKA SACHIN THAMKE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
—
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench disposed of the writ petition after the State of Maharashtra's Assistant Government Pleader undertook to decide the appeal against the Additional Commissioner's order under Section 39(3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 within four weeks. The Court accepted this undertaking and disposed of the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2887/2026
The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench disposed of the writ petition after the State of Maharashtra's Assistant Government Pleader undertook to decide the appeal against the Additional Commissioner's order under Section 39(3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 within four weeks. The Court accepted this undertaking and disposed of the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts