SHRI. PRASHANT DNYANESHWAR KOLHE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. MINISTER, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/2887/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed-Off on 15th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM040102572026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

18th April 2026

Filing Number

WP/7008/2026

Filing Date

23-03-2026

Registration No

WP/2887/2026

Registration Date

07-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed-Off

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Bombay Village Panchayat Act

Petitioner(s)

SHRI. PRASHANT DNYANESHWAR KOLHE

Adv. BHOJRAJ SITARAM DHANDALE

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. MINISTER, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS.

THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, NAGPUR

THE ZILLA PARISHAD, CHANDRAPUR, THR. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CHANDRAPUR

THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, CHIMUR

PRIYANKA SACHIN THAMKE

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

18-04-2026

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench disposed of the writ petition after the State of Maharashtra's Assistant Government Pleader undertook to decide the appeal against the Additional Commissioner's order under Section 39(3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 within four weeks. The Court accepted this undertaking and disposed of the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench disposed of the writ petition after the State of Maharashtra's Assistant Government Pleader undertook to decide the appeal against the Additional Commissioner's order under Section 39(3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 within four weeks. The Court accepted this undertaking and disposed of the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case