BANDU DEORAO ASAPWAR vs STATE OF MAHA., DEPT. OF STATE EXCISE, MUMBAI THR. SECRETARY FOR MINISTER OF STATE EXCISE AND ORS. — WP/2659/2026
Case under The Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels, Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Section 226,227. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM040102182026
Filing Number
WP/6977/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/2659/2026
Registration Date
30-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 08-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BANDU DEORAO ASAPWAR
Adv. SAYAJEE S. JAGTAP,S.G. JAGTAP,S.G. JAGTAP, ,S.G. JAGTAP
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHA., DEPT. OF STATE EXCISE, MUMBAI THR. SECRETARY FOR MINISTER OF STATE EXCISE AND ORS.
-
2.COMMISSONER OF STATE EXCISE, MUMBAI
-
3.COLLECTOR, STATE EXCISE, CHANDRAPUR
-
4.SUPERINTENDENT OF STATE EXCISE CHANDRAPUR
-
5.SHRI VILAS BHIKAJI TEMBHURNE
Case History
-
27-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Apr-2026
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
-
14-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) issued notice to respondents in Writ Petition No. 2659 of 2026 filed by Bandu Deorao Asapwar against the State of Maharashtra's Department of State Excise, with the notice returnable after three weeks and interim relief also granted. The court kept the issue of the petitioner's locus standing open for future consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2659/2026
Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) issued notice to respondents in Writ Petition No. 2659 of 2026 filed by Bandu Deorao Asapwar against the State of Maharashtra's Department of State Excise, with the notice returnable after three weeks and interim relief also granted. The court kept the issue of the petitioner's locus standing open for future consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts