VINIT S/O SHIVKUMAR AGRAWAL vs KU. RIDDHI KAMALKISHOR AGRAWAL AND OTHERS — WP/2642/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM040099932026

Filing Number

WP/6830/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/2642/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 08-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VINIT S/O SHIVKUMAR AGRAWAL

    Adv. BHUVANESH N. RAUT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KU. RIDDHI KAMALKISHOR AGRAWAL AND OTHERS

  2. 2.KU. SIDDHI KAMALKISHOR AGRAWAL

  3. 3.KU. RADHIKA KAMALKISHOR AGRAWAL

  4. 4.KAMALKISHOR S/O MOTILAL AGRAWAL

  5. 5.GOPALDAS S/O MOTILAL AGRAWAL

  6. 6.JYOTI W/O VINODKUMAR GAIN

  7. 7.SWARNALATA W/O UTTAMCHAND AGRAWAL

  8. 8.DR. NILAM RAJESHWAR SHARMA

  9. 9.VIKAS S/O UTTAMCHAND AGRAWAL

  10. 10.MANOJ S/O UTTAMCHAND AGRAWAL

  11. 11.RADHESHYAM S/O GORELAL AGRAWAL

  12. 12.KAILASH S/O GORELAL AGRAWAL

  13. 13.SHIV S/O GORELAL AGRAWAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Apr-2026

    —

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF

    The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) dismissed the writ petition challenging the trial court's rejection of an application to recall Defendant No. 9 for further cross-examination under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC. The court upheld the trial court's decision, noting that the petitioner had already exhaustively cross-examined the witness and the application was merely an attempt to fill gaps in the earlier cross-examination, with boundary discrepancies being matters for the court's appreciation of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2642/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) dismissed the writ petition challenging the trial court's rejection of an application to recall Defendant No. 9 for further cross-examination under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC. The court upheld the trial court's decision, noting that the petitioner had already exhaustively cross-examined the witness and the application was merely an attempt to fill gaps in the earlier cross-examination, with boundary discrepancies being matters for the court's appreciation of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case