THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA , THE COMMISSIONER SPORTS AND YOUTH SERVICES PUNE AND ORS. vs ATMARAM S/O NAMDEO BHUSARI Advocate - PRATIK JAYANT MEHTA, (FOR RESPONDENT) — WP/3017/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040099452026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

WP/6799/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/3017/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Industrial Dispute Act, 1947
Mah. Civil Services Pension Rules

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA , THE COMMISSIONER SPORTS AND YOUTH SERVICES PUNE AND ORS.

    Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER

  2. 2.THE PRESIDENT TALUKA SPORTS SANKUL SAMITEE MEHKAR, BULDHANA

  3. 3.THE SECRETARY TALUKA SPORTS SANKUL SAMITEE MEHKAR, BULDHANA

  4. 4.THE DISTRICT SPORTS OFFICER BULDHANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ATMARAM S/O NAMDEO BHUSARI Advocate - PRATIK JAYANT MEHTA, (FOR RESPONDENT)

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission-Labour And Industrial

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF

    The case has been adjourned for four weeks. The High Court issued notice to the respondent and granted interim relief by directing that no coercive action be taken against the petitioners (State) based on the Industrial Court's regularization order until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3017/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The case has been adjourned for four weeks. The High Court issued notice to the respondent and granted interim relief by directing that no coercive action be taken against the petitioners (State) based on the Industrial Court's regularization order until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case