SHEKHAR S/O ASHOK DANTALE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, URBAN DEVPT. DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/2399/2026
Case under Mah. Regional Town Planning Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 27th March 2026.
CNR: HCBM040097582026
Filing Number
WP/6678/2026
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/2399/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHEKHAR S/O ASHOK DANTALE
Adv. ASHWIN RAMRAO INGOLE
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, URBAN DEVPT. DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS.
-
2.NAGPUR IMPROVEMENT TRUST, THR ITS CHAIRMAN, NAGPUR
-
3.THE DIVISIONAL OFFICER (SOUTH) NAGPUR IMPROVEMENT TRUST, NAGPUR
-
4.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ZONE NO. 3, NAGPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, NAGPUR
-
5.PRAKASH KAIKADE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
—
-
27-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of Writ Petition No. 2399 of 2026 by allowing the petitioner's withdrawal with liberty to file appropriate proceedings in Civil Court. No costs were awarded to either party, and the court granted permission as sought by the petitioner's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2399/2026
The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of Writ Petition No. 2399 of 2026 by allowing the petitioner's withdrawal with liberty to file appropriate proceedings in Civil Court. No costs were awarded to either party, and the court granted permission as sought by the petitioner's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts