SIDDHARTH S/O SHIVNATH RAMTEKE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS GADGE NAGAR, AMRAVATI — BA/378/2026
Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 439. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM040096342026
Filing Number
BA/3039/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
BA/378/2026
Registration Date
23-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
BAIL/INTERIM BAIL ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SIDDHARTH S/O SHIVNATH RAMTEKE
Adv. MANOJ PRABHUDAS KARIYA,PARITA N. LAKHANI,PARITA N. LAKHANI, ,PARITA N. LAKHANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS (Police Station) GADGE NAGAR, AMRAVATI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
Ba (Fresh)
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar
-
06-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF
The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) rejected bail applications filed by Siddharth Shivnath Ramteke, who sought bail citing trial delay despite being in jail since November 2022. The court declined bail because the trial is at an advanced stage and granted a 5-month extension to the trial court, but permitted the applicant to file a fresh bail plea if the trial remains pending after this extension period. The court also directed the trial court to conduct daily hearings given the applicant's prolonged incarceration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BA/378/2026
The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) rejected bail applications filed by Siddharth Shivnath Ramteke, who sought bail citing trial delay despite being in jail since November 2022. The court declined bail because the trial is at an advanced stage and granted a 5-month extension to the trial court, but permitted the applicant to file a fresh bail plea if the trial remains pending after this extension period. The court also directed the trial court to conduct daily hearings given the applicant's prolonged incarceration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts