SAU. RAJANI KARDE W/O ATUL KARDE vs ATUL S/O BHASKARRAO KARDE — HCBM40096012026

Case under Family Court Act Section 19. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Next hearing 09-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040096012026

Filing Number

FCA/6568/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Judge

Registrar (Judicial)

Coram

Registrar (Judicial)

Bench Type

Division

Category

FAMILY LAW ( 16 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Family Court Act Section 19
Special Marriage Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAU. RAJANI KARDE W/O ATUL KARDE

    Adv. ASHISH B. CHOUBE,VIJAY RAMCHANDRA HAMAND,VIJAY RAMCHANDRA HAMAND, ,RAKESH JUGALKISHOR SHARMA,VIJAY RAMCHANDRA HAMAND

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ATUL S/O BHASKARRAO KARDE

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    For Orders -

    Registrar (Judicial)

  3. 05-May-2026

    Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

    Summary: In Family Court Appeal (ST.) No. 6568/2026, the Registrar (Judicial) addressed a delay condonation objection regarding the appeal's timeliness. The Registrar noted conflicting precedents: a 2016 Bombay High Court judgment established a 90-day limitation period under Section 28(4) of the Hindu Marriage Act, but the 2021 Supreme Court judgment in Arunoday Singh V/s Lee Anne Elton held the limitation period is 30 days, not 90 days. The matter was placed before the Court with the limitation objection for consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 05-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Family Court Appeal (ST.) No. 6568/2026, the Registrar (Judicial) addressed a delay condonation objection regarding the appeal's timeliness. The Registrar noted conflicting precedents: a 2016 Bombay High Court judgment established a 90-day limitation period under Section 28(4) of the Hindu Marriage Act, but the 2021 Supreme Court judgment in Arunoday Singh V/s Lee Anne Elton held the limitation period is 30 days, not 90 days. The matter was placed before the Court with the limitation objection for consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case