MR. HIMANSHU S/O MANGESH DHOTE vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND VICE-PRESIDENT, THE. S. T. CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, NAGPUR AND ORS. — WP/3735/2026
Case under S.c. & S.t. Orders (Amendment) Act Section 226,227. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM040094762026
Next Hearing
29th July 2026
Filing Number
WP/6498/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
WP/3735/2026
Registration Date
30-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE , HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE , HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MR. HIMANSHU S/O MANGESH DHOTE
Adv. ANANTA RAMTEKE
Respondent(s)
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND VICE-PRESIDENT, THE. S. T. CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, NAGPUR AND ORS.
STATE COMMON ENTRANCE TEST CELL, MAHARASHTRA STATE, MUMBAI
YESHWANTRAO CHAVAN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, WANADONGRI, NAGPUR
PROJECT OFFICER, TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, NAGPUR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE , HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA
FRESH ADMISSION-CASTE SCRUTINY MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-05-2026 | |
| 29-07-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION-CASTE SCRUTINY MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: WP 3735/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) adjourned the writ petition filed by Himanshu Dhote against the ST Certificate Scrutiny Committee and others. The court issued notice to respondents, granted time for filing replies, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 29-07-2026. The petitioner was permitted to serve one respondent through all available modes of service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP 3735/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) adjourned the writ petition filed by Himanshu Dhote against the ST Certificate Scrutiny Committee and others. The court issued notice to respondents, granted time for filing replies, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 29-07-2026. The petitioner was permitted to serve one respondent through all available modes of service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts