M/S. REAL TECH PRIVATE LIMITED, THR. DIRECTOR, NAGPUR AND OTHERS vs C. JOGESHWAR RAO @ C. SHRIRAM NAIDU S/O. C. SURYANARAYANRAO NAIDU AND ORS. — WP/2377/2026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 226,227. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM040094372026
Filing Number
WP/6473/2026
Filing Date
13-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/2377/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 08-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S. REAL TECH PRIVATE LIMITED, THR. DIRECTOR, NAGPUR AND OTHERS
Adv. V. V. BHANGDE,VAIDEHI BHANGDE,VAIDEHI BHANGDE, ,Y.R. KINKHEDE,VAIDEHI BHANGDE
-
2.SHRI ANIL NAIR
-
3.SHRI ATUL SHANTARAM BARAHATE
Respondent(s)
-
1.C. JOGESHWAR RAO @ C. SHRIRAM NAIDU S/O. C. SURYANARAYANRAO NAIDU AND ORS.
-
2.SMT. RAJALAXMI W/O SURESH NAYADU
-
3.MISS. C. MRUDULA NAIDU
-
4.SMT. KALPANA BONDU RAO THR. P.O.A. MISS. MRUDULA NAIDU
Case History
-
08-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Apr-2026
Fresh Admission-Matters Under CIVIL Procedure Code
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
-
02-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF
Summary: In Writ Petition No. 2377 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench), the court issued notice to the respondents returnable on 08th April 2026. The petitioners (M/S. Real Tech Private Limited) are permitted to serve the respondents through both private and regular modes of service, including service on the respondent's advocate before the trial court, with an affidavit of service to be filed by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2377/2026
Summary: In Writ Petition No. 2377 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench), the court issued notice to the respondents returnable on 08th April 2026. The petitioners (M/S. Real Tech Private Limited) are permitted to serve the respondents through both private and regular modes of service, including service on the respondent's advocate before the trial court, with an affidavit of service to be filed by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts