THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH POLICE STATION OFFICER, POLICE STATION TIOSA, AMRAVATI Government Pleader vs MOHAN MANDEO CHAVHAN — REVN/55/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules Section 8(c),20(b)(ii)(c),20. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Next hearing 08-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040094102026

e-Filing Number

12-03-2026

Filing Number

REVN/2953/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

REVN/55/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

ANTICIPATORY BAIL ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules Section 8(c),20(b)(ii)(c),20

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH POLICE STATION OFFICER, POLICE STATION TIOSA, AMRAVATI Government Pleader

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHAN MANDEO CHAVHAN

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

    Case Summary: REVN 55/2026 The State of Maharashtra's Criminal Revision Application challenging an anticipatory bail order granted to respondent Mohan Mandeo Chavhan was dismissed as not maintainable. The High Court held that revision applications against anticipatory bail orders cannot be entertained under established precedent. The State was granted liberty to pursue appropriate alternative proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. REVN/55/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: REVN 55/2026 The State of Maharashtra's Criminal Revision Application challenging an anticipatory bail order granted to respondent Mohan Mandeo Chavhan was dismissed as not maintainable. The High Court held that revision applications against anticipatory bail orders cannot be entertained under established precedent. The State was granted liberty to pursue appropriate alternative proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case