JAYSHREE W/O DEEPAK YADAV AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF MAH. THR. PS RING ROAD JARIPATKA NAGPUR AND ANOTHER — APL/485/2023
Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 28th November 2025.
CNR: HCBM040093662023
e-Filing Number
28-03-2023
Filing Number
APL/2682/2023
Filing Date
29-Mar-2023
Registration No
APL/485/2023
Registration Date
30-Mar-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande
Bench Type
Division
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
QUASHING OF FIR C.R., CHARGE SHEET OR PROSECUTION ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
28-Nov-2025
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAYSHREE W/O DEEPAK YADAV AND ANOTHER
Adv. SHUBHAUNSHU S. JOSHI, ,JITESH S. DUHILANI
-
2.DEEPAK NARMADAPRASAD YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAH. THR. PS (Police Station) RING ROAD JARIPATKA NAGPUR AND ANOTHER
Adv. ,VIRAT SURENDRA MISHRA,AYUSH MUNNALAL SHARMA,KABIR RAJ JHAMB,GAURAVI MISHRA 1123
-
2.RAJESH BALIRAM BHIMTE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke,hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao DeshpandeView PDF
-
28-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke,hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao DeshpandeView PDF
Case Summary: APL/485/2023 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) quashed FIR No. 228/2018 and charge sheet 62/2022 against applicants Jayshree and Deepak Yadav for cheating under IPC Section 420. The Court found that even accepting the FIR allegations as true, no criminal offense was made out against the applicants, as they lawfully purchased land from Krushna Kantode via registered deed. The real dispute involved Laxman Kantode's double sale of his share—first to Bandhu Housing Society and later to Sunil Khobragade—making it a civil property dispute rather than criminal fraud by the applicants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Nov-2025
For Pronouncement Of Judgement At 10.30 A.m.(criminal Side Matters)
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande
-
18-Nov-2025
Applications For Admission - After Notice(criminal Side Matters)
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande
-
22-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke,hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao DeshpandeView PDF
-
11-Jan-2024
Applications For Admission - After Notice(criminal Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Vinay Joshi , Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani
-
04-Dec-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Vinay Joshi,hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. ChandwaniView PDF
-
04-Dec-2023
Applications For Admission - After Notice(criminal Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Vinay Joshi , Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani
-
23-Oct-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Vinay Joshi,hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. ChandwaniView PDF
-
23-Oct-2023
Applications For Admission - After Notice(criminal Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre , Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes
-
25-Sep-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre,hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki MenezesView PDF
-
25-Sep-2023
Applications For Admission - After Notice(criminal Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Vinay Joshi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes
-
28-Aug-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Vinay Joshi,hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki MenezesView PDF
-
28-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. APL/485/2023
Case Summary: APL/485/2023 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) quashed FIR No. 228/2018 and charge sheet 62/2022 against applicants Jayshree and Deepak Yadav for cheating under IPC Section 420. The Court found that even accepting the FIR allegations as true, no criminal offense was made out against the applicants, as they lawfully purchased land from Krushna Kantode via registered deed. The real dispute involved Laxman Kantode's double sale of his share—first to Bandhu Housing Society and later to Sunil Khobragade—making it a civil property dispute rather than criminal fraud by the applicants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts