EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BEMBLA CANAL DIVISION, (V.I.D.C) YAVATMAL vs SAU. JYOTIBAI SUDHAKAR GEDEKAR THR. P.O.A. HOLDER SUDHAKAR V. GEDEKAR AND OTHERS Advocate - ASHISH B. NAKSHANE — CAF/2248/2026

Case under Other Act Section 00. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040088052026

Filing Number

CAF/6065/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

CAF/2248/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Act Section 00

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BEMBLA CANAL DIVISION, (V.I.D.C) YAVATMAL

    Adv. VIVEK GOVIND PALSHIKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAU. JYOTIBAI SUDHAKAR GEDEKAR THR. P.O.A. HOLDER SUDHAKAR V. GEDEKAR AND OTHERS Advocate - ASHISH B. NAKSHANE

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF

    Case Summary: CAF 2248/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed the civil application filed by respondent No. 1's counsel seeking withdrawal of pending compensation. The court ordered that the balance amount of Rs. 3,92,289/- in compensation be withdrawn through the power of attorney holder Sudhakar Vithal Gedekar and credited to the claimant's account. The application was allowed and disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Jun-2026

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAF/2248/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CAF 2248/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed the civil application filed by respondent No. 1's counsel seeking withdrawal of pending compensation. The court ordered that the balance amount of Rs. 3,92,289/- in compensation be withdrawn through the power of attorney holder Sudhakar Vithal Gedekar and credited to the claimant's account. The application was allowed and disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case