DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, YAVATMAL CENTRAL RAILWAY, WARDHA vs GANESH PREMSINGH PACHORE AND OTHERS — CAF/1584/2026

Case under Limitation Act,1963 Section 05. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040086952026

Filing Number

CAF/5989/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

CAF/1584/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act,1963 Section 05

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, YAVATMAL CENTRAL RAILWAY, WARDHA

    Adv. SAURABH A. CHAUDHARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GANESH PREMSINGH PACHORE AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. VyasView PDF

    Case Summary: CAF/1584/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) heard the Deputy Chief Engineer, Yavatmal Central Railway's application for condonation of delay. The court issued notice returnable on 31/07/2026, with service waived for respondents 3 and 4. The appellant was directed to serve remaining respondents through private modes and file an affidavit of service. Additionally, the court directed the acquiring body to deposit the entire award amount plus interest within eight weeks before any stay application would be considered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Apr-2026

    —

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAF/1584/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CAF/1584/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) heard the Deputy Chief Engineer, Yavatmal Central Railway's application for condonation of delay. The court issued notice returnable on 31/07/2026, with service waived for respondents 3 and 4. The appellant was directed to serve remaining respondents through private modes and file an affidavit of service. Additionally, the court directed the acquiring body to deposit the entire award amount plus interest within eight weeks before any stay application would be considered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case