NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. THR. SR. DIVISIONAL MANAGER, AMRAVATI THR. REGIONAL MANAGER, NAGPUR vs NALINI WD/O DEEPAK PAWAR AND OTHERS Advocate - SAWAN ALASPURKAR — CAF/1423/2026

Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM040086272026

Filing Number

CAF/5939/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

CAF/1423/2026

Registration Date

25-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Act Section 00

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. THR. SR. DIVISIONAL MANAGER, AMRAVATI THR. REGIONAL MANAGER, NAGPUR

    Adv. DR. COLLIN C. ANTHONY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NALINI WD/O DEEPAK PAWAR AND OTHERS Advocate - SAWAN ALASPURKAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand KhobragadeView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed the application by legal heirs of deceased Deepak Pawar to withdraw compensation awarded in a fatal 2018 motor accident case. Despite New India Assurance Company's opposition claiming no liability, the court permitted withdrawal of 50% of the compensation amount to each heir upon furnishing an undertaking, considering their financial needs and the MACT's attribution of 60% negligence to the insured vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Apr-2026

    —

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAF/1423/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed the application by legal heirs of deceased Deepak Pawar to withdraw compensation awarded in a fatal 2018 motor accident case. Despite New India Assurance Company's opposition claiming no liability, the court permitted withdrawal of 50% of the compensation amount to each heir upon furnishing an undertaking, considering their financial needs and the MACT's attribution of 60% negligence to the insured vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case