KU. VAISHNAVI DATTA PARATE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT DEPT., MUMBAI AND ANOTHER — WP/2370/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040084652026
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/5838/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
WP/2370/2026
Registration Date
18-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M. S. JAWALKAR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NANDESH SHANKARRAO DESHPANDE
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M. S. JAWALKAR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NANDESH SHANKARRAO DESHPANDE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KU. VAISHNAVI DATTA PARATE
Adv. JAYKUMAR S. WANKHEDE
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT DEPT., MUMBAI AND ANOTHER
DEPUTY DIRECTOR AND MEMBER SECRETARY, SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, YAVATMAL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M. S. JAWALKAR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NANDESH SHANKARRAO DESHPANDE
FOR ADMISSION-CASTE SCRUTINY MATTERS
FOR ADMISSION-CASTE SCRUTINY MATTERS
FRESH ADMISSION - CIRCULATED (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | |
| 25-06-2026 | FOR ADMISSION-CASTE SCRUTINY MATTERS |
| 22-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION-CASTE SCRUTINY MATTERS |
| 15-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION - CIRCULATED (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS) |
Orders
Case Adjourned. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench adjourned Writ Petition No. 2370/2026 (Ku. Vaishnavi v. State of Maharashtra) to 25-06-2026. The respondent is directed to file an affidavit in reply with advance copy to the petitioner, who may file a rejoinder if needed. The AGP must keep the Scrutiny Committee records ready for the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Adjourned. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench adjourned Writ Petition No. 2370/2026 (Ku. Vaishnavi v. State of Maharashtra) to 25-06-2026. The respondent is directed to file an affidavit in reply with advance copy to the petitioner, who may file a rejoinder if needed. The AGP must keep the Scrutiny Committee records ready for the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts