VIJAY RAMESHWAR MUNDRA vs HONBLE MINISTER (REVENUE), STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI AND OTHERS — WP/3725/2026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 226,227. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040079332026
Filing Number
WP/5501/2026
Filing Date
04-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/3725/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIJAY RAMESHWAR MUNDRA
Adv. A.M. CHANDEKAR,RUSHIKESH RAVINDRA MADDALWAR,RUSHIKESH RAVINDRA MADDALWAR, ,SANDEEP NARESH SINGH,RUSHIKESH RAVINDRA MADDALWAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.HONBLE MINISTER (REVENUE), STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI AND OTHERS
-
2.DEPUT Y DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORD, NAGPUR REGION, NAGPUR
-
3.DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF LAND RECORDS GONDIA
-
4.DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF LAND RECORDS, GONDIA
-
5.VITHAL S/O RAMESHWAR MUNDRA
-
6.SMT. SHANTU W/O RAMGOPAL SOMANI
-
7.SMT. KANTA RAKESH BINZANI
Case History
-
23-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Jun-2026
For Admission - Fresh (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare
-
23-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. PansareView PDF
Case Summary: WP/3725/2026 Outcome: The writ petition was adjourned. Notice was issued to respondents returnable on 23/6/2026. The petitioner was directed to serve remaining respondents via all permissible modes including speed post and file an affidavit of service. The petitioner must also place on record copies of the Will and objections raised before respondent no. 4. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/3725/2026
Case Summary: WP/3725/2026 Outcome: The writ petition was adjourned. Notice was issued to respondents returnable on 23/6/2026. The petitioner was directed to serve remaining respondents via all permissible modes including speed post and file an affidavit of service. The petitioner must also place on record copies of the Will and objections raised before respondent no. 4. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts