V.I.D.C., MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, WASHIM THROUGH EXECUTIVE ENGINEER vs UDDHAV MALHARI KHODKE AND OTHERS — CAF/1323/2026

Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: --C.A. Disposed off on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 02-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM040076112026

Filing Number

CAF/5298/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

CAF/1323/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande

Coram

Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--C.A. Disposed off

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Act Section 00

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.V.I.D.C., MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, WASHIM THROUGH EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

    Adv. UJJWALA ARUN PATIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UDDHAV MALHARI KHODKE AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar,hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao DeshpandeView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench allowed the Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation's application to deposit the decretal amount, which could not be deposited within the original eight-week deadline due to sanction approval delays. The court extended the deposit deadline to 06/04/2026 and permitted the appellant to deposit the cheque with the High Court Nazir, with respondents consenting to the deposit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAF/1323/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench allowed the Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation's application to deposit the decretal amount, which could not be deposited within the original eight-week deadline due to sanction approval delays. The court extended the deposit deadline to 06/04/2026 and permitted the appellant to deposit the cheque with the High Court Nazir, with respondents consenting to the deposit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case