MADHAV S/O KESHAV SURYAWANSHI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECY. TRIBAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ANR. — WP/3402/2026
Case under S.c. & S.t. Orders (Amendment) Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040075262026
Filing Number
WP/5234/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
WP/3402/2026
Registration Date
23-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
17-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MADHAV S/O KESHAV SURYAWANSHI
Adv. GOPAL G. MISHRA,VIVEK GANESH INGLE,VIVEK GANESH INGLE, ,VIVEK GANESH INGLE
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECY. TRIBAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ANR.
-
2.COMMITTEE FOR SERUTINY AND VERTIFICATION OF TRIBES CLAIM,THR. DY. DIRECTOR(R) MEMBER SECRETARY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF
Case Summary: WP/3402/2026 The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court disposed of the petition by directing the Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribes Claim to decide the petitioner's caste claim within two months from the date of judgment (17 June 2026). The court accepted the State's undertaking to expeditiously process the claim and clarified that it expressed no opinion on the merits, leaving the final decision to be made independently by the Committee in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
—
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/3402/2026
Case Summary: WP/3402/2026 The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court disposed of the petition by directing the Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribes Claim to decide the petitioner's caste claim within two months from the date of judgment (17 June 2026). The court accepted the State's undertaking to expeditiously process the claim and clarified that it expressed no opinion on the merits, leaving the final decision to be made independently by the Committee in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts