VINAYAK SHRIHARI PURKALWAR AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PRIN. SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPT., MUMBAI AND ORS. Advocate - NEETA JOG, ,RICHA P. TIWARI,(FOR APPLICANTS/INTERVENORS) — CAW/484/2026
Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040068922026
Filing Number
CAW/4843/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
CAW/484/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande
Coram
Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VINAYAK SHRIHARI PURKALWAR AND OTHERS
Adv. PRADEEP SHANTARAM KSHIRSAGAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PRIN. SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPT., MUMBAI AND ORS. Advocate - NEETA JOG, ,RICHA P. TIWARI,(FOR APPLICANTS/INTERVENORS)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar,hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao DeshpandeView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed two intervention applications (CAW 484/2026 and 525/2026) filed by Zilla Parishad Primary Teachers from Gadchiroli district who sought to intervene in the main writ petition. The court found the interveners were directly affected as they had acquired TET qualifications before the original petitioners and any outcome would impact their service records. The petitioner's counsel did not object, and the court permitted intervention while directing the cause title to be amended within two weeks and allowing the interveners to file additional affidavits on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
—
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CAW/484/2026
The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed two intervention applications (CAW 484/2026 and 525/2026) filed by Zilla Parishad Primary Teachers from Gadchiroli district who sought to intervene in the main writ petition. The court found the interveners were directly affected as they had acquired TET qualifications before the original petitioners and any outcome would impact their service records. The petitioner's counsel did not object, and the court permitted intervention while directing the cause title to be amended within two weeks and allowing the interveners to file additional affidavits on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts