THE EDUCATION OFFICER (PRIMARY), ZILLA PARISHAD, NAGPUR vs SMT. MAYA VIKRAM PINGLE Advocate - AKSHAYA SUDAME, ,FIDVI IBRAHIM ABID,(FOR R — CAO/274/2026

Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: Contested--C.A. Disposed off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM040068842026

Filing Number

CAO/4836/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

CAO/274/2026

Registration Date

26-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande

Coram

Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--C.A. Disposed off

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Act Section 00

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE EDUCATION OFFICER (PRIMARY), ZILLA PARISHAD, NAGPUR

    Adv. SHAIKH MAJID,(FOR APPLICANT/PETITIONER), ,SHAIKH MAJID,(FOR APPLICANT/PETITIONER)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. MAYA VIKRAM PINGLE Advocate - AKSHAYA SUDAME, ,FIDVI IBRAHIM ABID,(FOR R

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar,hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao DeshpandeView PDF

    Summary of CAO/274/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) dismissed the Education Officer's review petition challenging an earlier order that granted Smt. Maya Vikram Pingle pensionary and service benefits from her 1991 appointment date, despite her lacking mandatory D.Ed. qualification until 1999. The court held that Government Resolution 2011.11 permitted B.A., B.Ed.-qualified teachers to be deemed trained from their appointment date, and Rule 19 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Rules, 1981 does not bar counting pre-1999 service since she held a sanctioned post at retirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Apr-2026

    —

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAO/274/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CAO/274/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) dismissed the Education Officer's review petition challenging an earlier order that granted Smt. Maya Vikram Pingle pensionary and service benefits from her 1991 appointment date, despite her lacking mandatory D.Ed. qualification until 1999. The court held that Government Resolution 2011.11 permitted B.A., B.Ed.-qualified teachers to be deemed trained from their appointment date, and Rule 19 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Rules, 1981 does not bar counting pre-1999 service since she held a sanctioned post at retirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case