THE EDUCATION OFFICER (PRIMARY), ZILLA PARISHAD, NAGPUR vs SMT. MAYA VIKRAM PINGLE — MCA/320/2026

Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 23-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040068832026

Filing Number

MCA/4835/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

MCA/320/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande

Coram

Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Act Section 00

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE EDUCATION OFFICER (PRIMARY), ZILLA PARISHAD, NAGPUR

    Adv. SHAIKH MAJID,(FOR APPLICANT/PETITIONER), ,SHAIKH MAJID,(FOR APPLICANT/PETITIONER)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. MAYA VIKRAM PINGLE

  2. 2.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA MUMBAI, THR. SECRETARY, DEPARATMENT OF EDUCATION

  3. 3.BAL MANDIR SANSTHA, NAGPUR, THR. SECRETARY

  4. 4.LT. COLONEL V.D. PARANJAPE MEMORIAL SCHOOL, NAGPUR, THR. HEADMISTRESS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar,hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao DeshpandeView PDF

    Case Summary: Education Officer v. Smt. Maya Vikram Pingle The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench dismissed the Education Officer's review petition challenging an earlier order granting Smt. Pingle pension and service benefits from her 1991 appointment date. The court upheld that under Maharashtra Government Resolutions (2011, 2014), B.A./B.Ed.-qualified teachers are deemed trained from their appointment date, and Rule 19 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Rules does not exclude their pre-1999 unaided service from pension calculations once the school received grant-in-aid status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 05-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCA/320/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Education Officer v. Smt. Maya Vikram Pingle The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench dismissed the Education Officer's review petition challenging an earlier order granting Smt. Pingle pension and service benefits from her 1991 appointment date. The court upheld that under Maharashtra Government Resolutions (2011, 2014), B.A./B.Ed.-qualified teachers are deemed trained from their appointment date, and Rule 19 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Rules does not exclude their pre-1999 unaided service from pension calculations once the school received grant-in-aid status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case