DINESH S/O. YOGESHWAR NANDANWAR vs THE UNION OF INDIA, THR. THE GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY, BILASPUR AND ANR. — MCA/254/2026
Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM040068412026
Next Hearing
02nd May 2026
Filing Number
MCA/4805/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
MCA/254/2026
Registration Date
20-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DINESH S/O. YOGESHWAR NANDANWAR
Adv. NISHA GAJBHIYE(WASNIK)
Respondent(s)
THE UNION OF INDIA, THR. THE GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY, BILASPUR AND ANR.
DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER SOUTH EAST RAILWAY, NAGPUR DIVISION, NAGPUR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR
FOR ORDERS - -
FOR ORDERS - -
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | FOR ORDERS - - |
| 06-04-2026 | FOR ORDERS - - |
| 02-05-2026 |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed the petitioner's application to condone a 20-day delay in filing a restoration application for his writ petition, which had been rejected for non-compliance with office objections. The court found the delay was unintentional, as the petitioner lacked knowledge of the Registrar's conditional order dated 12.01.2026. The petitioner was granted two weeks to remove the outstanding office objections, after which the writ petition would be restored for merit-based consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed the petitioner's application to condone a 20-day delay in filing a restoration application for his writ petition, which had been rejected for non-compliance with office objections. The court found the delay was unintentional, as the petitioner lacked knowledge of the Registrar's conditional order dated 12.01.2026. The petitioner was granted two weeks to remove the outstanding office objections, after which the writ petition would be restored for merit-based consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts