SHAIK RASHID S/O SHAIKH NAWAB vs UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, SECUNDERABAD — CAF/665/2025

Case under Limitation Act,1963 Section 05. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 06-Mar-2025

CNR: HCBM040055352025

Filing Number

CAF/4081/2025

Filing Date

17-Feb-2025

Registration No

CAF/665/2025

Registration Date

25-Feb-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 08-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act,1963 Section 05

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAIK RASHID S/O SHAIKH NAWAB

    Adv. NAGSEN RAMESH MANKAR,DEVEN S. LAMBAT,DEVEN S. LAMBAT, ,DEVEN S. LAMBAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, SECUNDERABAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed the condonation application filed by Shaik Rashid against the Union of India, condoning a 13-day delay in filing the First Appeal against the Railway Claims Tribunal's judgment dated 09.08.2025. The court found that the applicant had provided sufficient explanation for the delay as contemplated under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, despite the respondent's opposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2025

  4. 17-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAF/665/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed the condonation application filed by Shaik Rashid against the Union of India, condoning a 13-day delay in filing the First Appeal against the Railway Claims Tribunal's judgment dated 09.08.2025. The court found that the applicant had provided sufficient explanation for the delay as contemplated under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, despite the respondent's opposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case