POONAM W/O VISHAL WAGH vs VISHAL S/O PRABHAKAR WAGH — WP/126/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

Next hearing 08-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM040054782026

e-Filing Number

12-01-2026

Filing Number

WP/1622/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

WP/126/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 08-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.POONAM W/O VISHAL WAGH

    Adv. ALPESH D. DESHMUKH, ,TEJAS S. DESHPANDE,KIRTI DESHPANDE,SHASHIKANT S. NAGRARE,ADV. FOR APPLICANT NO. 1 AND

  2. 2.RANDHEER @ VIPUN S/O VISHAL WAGH

    Adv. DESHMUKH ALPESH DEORAOJI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VISHAL S/O PRABHAKAR WAGH

Case History

  1. 08-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Petitions For Orders (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

    Summary: In Criminal Writ Petition No. 126/2026 before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court, the case was adjourned. Fresh notice was issued to the respondent, returnable on 08.04.2026, and the petitioners' counsel was permitted to serve the respondent through all permissible modes of service under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh (Criminal Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/126/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Criminal Writ Petition No. 126/2026 before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court, the case was adjourned. Fresh notice was issued to the respondent, returnable on 08.04.2026, and the petitioners' counsel was permitted to serve the respondent through all permissible modes of service under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case