WESTERN COALFIELDS LTD., THROUGH DY. GENERAL MANAGER vs UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND ANOTHER — CAW/363/2026

Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: --C.A. Disposed off on 09th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM040050622026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

24th February 2026

Filing Number

CAW/3567/2026

Filing Date

11-02-2026

Registration No

CAW/363/2026

Registration Date

11-02-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE YANSHIVRAJ GOPICHAND KHOBRAGADE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE YANSHIVRAJ GOPICHAND KHOBRAGADE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

09th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

--C.A. Disposed off

Acts & Sections

Other Act Section 00

Petitioner(s)

WESTERN COALFIELDS LTD., THROUGH DY. GENERAL MANAGER

Adv. MEHADIA SURESH CHANDRA

Respondent(s)

UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND ANOTHER

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE YANSHIVRAJ GOPICHAND KHOBRAGADE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

24-02-2026

Orders

09-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE YANSHIVRAJ GOPICHAND KHOBRAGADE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) allowed Western Coalfields Ltd.'s Civil Application to raise additional grounds in its writ petition against the Union of India's Ministry of Labour, finding the proposed grounds did not alter the petition's nature. The court directed the petitioner to amend its petition within two weeks and serve the amended copy to respondents, who were permitted to file replies if desired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) allowed Western Coalfields Ltd.'s Civil Application to raise additional grounds in its writ petition against the Union of India's Ministry of Labour, finding the proposed grounds did not alter the petition's nature. The court directed the petitioner to amend its petition within two weeks and serve the amended copy to respondents, who were permitted to file replies if desired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case