BANK OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. AUTHORIZED OFFICER, AMRAVATI vs UNION OF INDIA, THR. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS Advocate - KARTIK N SHUKUL, (FOR R — WP/4445/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 09th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM040044402026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/3128/2026

Filing Date

06-02-2026

Registration No

WP/4445/2026

Registration Date

01-06-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

09th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act

Petitioner(s)

BANK OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. AUTHORIZED OFFICER, AMRAVATI

Adv. UDAY ARUN GOSAVI,ASHWINI S. BHAGWAT,ASHWINI S. BHAGWAT, ,VIVEK KRISHNANARO KOLTE,ASHWINI S. BHAGWAT

Respondent(s)

UNION OF INDIA, THR. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS Advocate - KARTIK N SHUKUL, (FOR R

REGISTRAR, DEBTS REFCOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI

M/S SHAYAAN INDUSTRIES, AMRAVATI, THR. PROPRIETOR FAISAL ABRAR MOHAMMAD NISAR

MRS. NASEEM BANO MOHD. NISAR

MOHD. NISAR SHEIKH IMAM

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

16-06-2026

Orders

09-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of Bank of Maharashtra's writ petition as infructuous on June 9, 2026, after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the underlying challenge had become moot due to passage of time. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of Bank of Maharashtra's writ petition as infructuous on June 9, 2026, after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the underlying challenge had become moot due to passage of time. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Constitution of India Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case