SANTOSH S/O BABURAO KARANDE MAHESHWARI R. TALAHA vs MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD., GONDIA THR. ITS CHIEF ENGINEER AND OTHERS — MCA/301/2026
Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040043982026
Filing Number
MCA/3102/2026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
MCA/301/2026
Registration Date
08-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANTOSH S/O BABURAO KARANDE MAHESHWARI R. TALAHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD., GONDIA THR. ITS CHIEF ENGINEER AND OTHERS
-
2.MAHA. STATE ELECTRICITY DIST. COMPANY LTD., THR. ASSISTANT MANAGER, GONDIA
-
3.MAHA. STATE ELECTRI. BOARD (EAST.) MAHA. STATE ELECTRI. DISTRI. COM. LTD., THR.MANAGING DIR. MUMBAI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
—
Registrar (Judicial)
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo JoshiView PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed the applicant's plea for condonation of 193 days delay in challenging the Registrar's order that had refused registration of his review application. The court condoned the delay subject to payment of Rs. 3,000 costs and restored the review application to its original file for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
For Orders - -
Registrar (Judicial)
-
23-Mar-2026
Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
23-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCA/301/2026
Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed the applicant's plea for condonation of 193 days delay in challenging the Registrar's order that had refused registration of his review application. The court condoned the delay subject to payment of Rs. 3,000 costs and restored the review application to its original file for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts