SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., THROUGH ITS LEGAL OFFICER, NAGPUR vs SMT. KAVITA WD/O RAMDAS ASOLKAR AND OTHERS — FA/1984/2019
Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.
CNR: HCBM040039482018
Filing Number
FA/3063/2018
Filing Date
05-Feb-2018
Registration No
FA/1984/2019
Registration Date
20-Dec-2019
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote
Bench Type
Single
Category
COMPENSATION ( 7 )
Sub-Category
MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIM OTHER INJURY ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 08-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., THROUGH ITS LEGAL OFFICER, NAGPUR
Adv. HITESH N. VERMA,SUDHIR B. PANDEY,SUDHIR B. PANDEY, ,GIRISH INDERLAL DIPWANI,SUDHIR B. PANDEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.SMT. KAVITA WD/O RAMDAS ASOLKAR AND OTHERS
Adv. S.D. CHOPDE/R/8 & 9 1123
-
2.SHANTANU S/O RAMDAS ASOLKAR, MINOR THR. HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER RESPONDENT NO. 1
Adv. S.D. CHOPDE/R/8 &
-
3.SMT. KAMAL W/O SAHADEORAO ASOLKAR
Adv. S.D. CHOPDE/R/8 &
-
4.SHRI SAHADEORAO S/O PANDHARI ASOLKAR
Adv. S.D. CHOPDE/R/8 &
-
5.SHRI. MANOJ S/O DEVKINANDAN SHARMA
Adv. S.D. CHOPDE/R/8 &
-
6.SHRI KAILASH S/O BABAN DHOKRAT
Adv. S.D. CHOPDE/R/8 &
-
7.ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER, AKOLA
Adv. S.D. CHOPDE/R/8 &
-
8.SHRI VIJAY S/O SHAMRAO KALE
Adv. S.D. CHOPDE/R/8 &
-
9.SHRI MANGESH S/O DNYANDEORAO CENDALNE
Adv. S.D. CHOPDE/R/8 & 9
Case History
-
23-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Apr-2026
For Admission - (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. DhoteView PDF
Summary: In First Appeal No. 1985 of 2019 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, the case between Smt. Kavita (Appellant) and Manoj Devkinandan Sharma (Respondent) was adjourned. The court granted the appellants' counsel time to prepare and directed the case to stand over for four weeks, with the counsel having informed the insurance company's representative accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
For Admission -
Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote
-
10-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. DhoteView PDF
-
08-Dec-2025
For Admission-Macp Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. Patil
-
12-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. PatilView PDF
-
30-Nov-2024
For Admission ( CIVIL Side Matters )
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani
-
24-Sep-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. ChandwaniView PDF
-
23-Jul-2024
For Orders -
Registrar (Judicial)
-
16-Jul-2024
For Admission ( CIVIL Side Matters )
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani
-
19-Jun-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. ChandwaniView PDF
-
27-Feb-2024
For Orders - -
Registrar (Judicial)
-
30-Jan-2024
Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
22-Dec-2023
For Admission -
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor
-
04-Dec-2023
For Admission -
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor
-
19-Oct-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. KilorView PDF
-
10-Jan-2022
For Orders -
Registrar (Judicial)
-
30-Nov-2021
Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
24-Nov-2021
For Admission -
Hon'ble Shri Justice V.M. Deshpande
-
25-Oct-2021
Hon'ble Shri Justice V.M. DeshpandeView PDF
-
25-Oct-2021
For Admission -
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre
-
22-Dec-2020
Notification -
According To Sitting List
-
26-Feb-2020
Hon'ble Shri Justice Murlidhar Ganpatrao GiratkarView PDF
-
26-Feb-2020
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Murlidhar Ganpatrao Giratkar
-
05-Feb-2020
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Murlidhar Ganpatrao Giratkar
-
21-Jan-2020
Registrar(judicial)View PDF
-
21-Jan-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2018
Hon'ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq
-
05-Feb-2018
Case filed
Registration No. FA/1984/2019
Summary: In First Appeal No. 1985 of 2019 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, the case between Smt. Kavita (Appellant) and Manoj Devkinandan Sharma (Respondent) was adjourned. The court granted the appellants' counsel time to prepare and directed the case to stand over for four weeks, with the counsel having informed the insurance company's representative accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts