PARASHRAM AUSHADHALAYA, A PUBLIC TRUST, THR. TRUSTEE, VINAY KUMAR RAMESHWAR UGHADE vs GOVINDA ATI SADANSHIV AND OTHERS — WP/2546/2022

Case under Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act. (C.p.)maharashtra) Section 226, 227. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM040035652022

Next Hearing

29th April 2026

Filing Number

WP/2375/2022

Filing Date

16-02-2022

Registration No

WP/2546/2022

Registration Date

07-05-2022

Judge

REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)

Coram

REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act. (C.p.)maharashtra) Section 226, 227
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

PARASHRAM AUSHADHALAYA, A PUBLIC TRUST, THR. TRUSTEE, VINAY KUMAR RAMESHWAR UGHADE

Adv. IRA P. KHISTI,P R AGRAWAL,P R AGRAWAL, ,SHREYA HARISH BHAGAT,P R AGRAWAL

Respondent(s)

GOVINDA ATI SADANSHIV AND OTHERS

Adv. ,MRS. PRAJAKTA CHAUDHARI,ABHAY SAMBRE 1123

NIRMALA SHAMRAO SADANSHIV

RAHUL SHAMRAV SADANSHIV

ARUNA SHAMRAV SADANSHIV

KUSUM RAMDAS THORAT

SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ACHALPUR, AMRAVATI

MEMBER, MAHARASHTRA REVENUE TRIBUNAL, NAGPUR

Hearing History

Judge: REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)

02-01-2023

FRESH ADMISSION-

29-04-2026

FOR ORDERS -

04-09-2024

FOR ORDERS-

22-03-2024

FOR ORDERS -

25-01-2024

FOR ORDERS -

Orders

15-04-2026
REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)

Case Summary Writ Petition No. 2546 of 2022 filed by Parashram Aushadhalaya (Public Trust) against Govinda Ati Sadanshiv and others in the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur bench was adjourned on 15th April, 2026. The court directed that two weeks be granted to take necessary steps against Respondent No. 5, with no parties present at the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Writ Petition No. 2546 of 2022 filed by Parashram Aushadhalaya (Public Trust) against Govinda Ati Sadanshiv and others in the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur bench was adjourned on 15th April, 2026. The court directed that two weeks be granted to take necessary steps against Respondent No. 5, with no parties present at the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case