SWAPNIL S/O GAJANAN KALE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS RAM NAGAR, TAH AND DIST. CHANDRAPUR — ABA/296/2026
Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF AS A WITHDRAWN on 30th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM040035602026
Filing Number
ABA/1023/2026
Filing Date
31-Jan-2026
Registration No
ABA/296/2026
Registration Date
16-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
ANTICIPATORY BAIL ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
30-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF AS A WITHDRAWN
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SWAPNIL S/O GAJANAN KALE
Adv. SARABJEET SINGH,MOHIT G. REDDY,MOHIT G. REDDY, ,R.P. GHADGE,MOHIT G. REDDY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS (Police Station) RAM NAGAR, TAH AND DIST. CHANDRAPUR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. VyasView PDF
The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court allowed petitioner Swapnil Kale to withdraw his criminal application on 30.04.2026, granting him liberty to file a fresh anticipatory bail application before the Sessions Court since co-accused had already been granted anticipatory bail there. The application was disposed as withdrawn without being heard on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Aba (After Notice)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas
-
27-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. VyasView PDF
-
27-Apr-2026
Aba (Fresh)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. VyasView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ABA/296/2026
The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court allowed petitioner Swapnil Kale to withdraw his criminal application on 30.04.2026, granting him liberty to file a fresh anticipatory bail application before the Sessions Court since co-accused had already been granted anticipatory bail there. The application was disposed as withdrawn without being heard on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts