MOHAMMAD AKIL S/O MOHAMMAD SULEMAN MASOOD SHAREEF, KV THOMAS and AJ MIRZA vs SMT. REHANA KHANAM W/O ABDUL MUTALIB KHATIB — CRA/15/2012

Case under C.p.c.- (Non-interlocutory Order). Disposed: --DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-Feb-2012

CNR: HCBM040031942012

Filing Number

CRA/2430/2012

Filing Date

07-Feb-2012

Registration No

CRA/15/2012

Registration Date

13-Feb-2012

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Non-interlocutory Order)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMAD AKIL S/O MOHAMMAD SULEMAN MASOOD SHAREEF, KV THOMAS and AJ MIRZA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. REHANA KHANAM W/O ABDUL MUTALIB KHATIB

    Adv. S. RAISUDDIN (FOR R 1(a) and 1(b),SYED SUFIYAN (FOR R 1(a) and 1(b),M. YEJAJUL (FOR R 1(a) and 1(b),DIGVIJAY R. KHAPRE,PUSHKAR A. DESHPANDE 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo JoshiView PDF

    Case Summary: CRA 15/2012 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) dismissed the petitioner Mohammad Akil's challenge to an executing court's order that passed a final decree in a property partition suit, allowing respondent Smt. Rehana Khanam to execute her 1/6th share. The court held that while technically a formal final decree proceeding should follow a preliminary decree, the executing court's appointment of a commissioner and property division—done in compliance with the court's earlier writ petition directions—satisfied procedural requirements substantively, making the petitioner's objection merely technical and thus dismissible under Section 99 of the CPC. The court also rejected arguments that the respondent, as a decree transferee, lacked authority to execute without formal leave. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Execution Petitions (No Adjournment Will Be Granted)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi

  4. 28-Jul-2025

    For Orders -

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi

  5. 10-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. JoshiView PDF

  6. 22-Aug-2023

    For Orders -

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote

  7. 30-Jun-2023

    For Orders-

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote

  8. 26-Jun-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Avinash G. GharoteView PDF

  9. 26-Jun-2023

    For Orders-

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote

  10. 23-Jun-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Avinash G. GharoteView PDF

  11. 02-Mar-2023

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. JawalkarView PDF

  12. 18-Aug-2021

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin B. SuryawanshiView PDF

  13. 18-Aug-2021

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin B. SuryawanshiView PDF

  14. 19-Aug-2019

    For Final Hearing - (Year 2005)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq

  15. 07-Jan-2016

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Z.A. HaqView PDF

  16. 05-Jan-2015

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq

  17. 05-Jan-2015

    For Admission- CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq

  18. 03-Nov-2014

    For Hearing & Final Disposal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre

  19. 08-Sep-2014

    For Hearing & Final Disposal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravi K. Deshpande

  20. 27-Aug-2014

    For Hearing & Final Disposal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravi K. Deshpande

  21. 06-Aug-2014

    For Hearing & Final Disposal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P.B. Varale

  22. 23-Jul-2014

    For Hearing & Final Disposal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P.B. Varale

  23. 02-Jul-2014

    End Of Board -

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P.B. Varale

  24. 18-Jun-2014

    For Admission- CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P.B. Varale

  25. 11-Apr-2014

    For Admission- CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.B. Chaudhari

  26. 14-Mar-2014

    For Admission- CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.B. Chaudhari

  27. 28-Feb-2014

    For Admission- CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P.B. Varale

  28. 29-Jan-2014

    For Admission- CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M.T. Joshi

  29. 08-Jan-2014

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M.T. JoshiView PDF

  30. 08-Jan-2014

    For Admission- CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M.T. Joshi

  31. 25-Sep-2012

    For Hearing & Final Disposal [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravi K. Deshpande

  32. 12-Sep-2012

    For Hearing & Final Disposal [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravi K. Deshpande

  33. 06-Sep-2012

    For Hearing & Final Disposal [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravi K. Deshpande

  34. 23-Aug-2012

    For Hearing & Final Disposal [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravi K. Deshpande

  35. 10-Aug-2012

    For Hearing & Final Disposal [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravi K. Deshpande

  36. 03-Aug-2012

    For Hearing & Final Disposal [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravi K. Deshpande

  37. 20-Jul-2012

    For Hearing & Final Disposal [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravi K. Deshpande

  38. 03-May-2012

    For Hearing & Final Disposal [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.B. Chaudhari

  39. 19-Apr-2012

    For Hearing & Final Disposal [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.B. Chaudhari

  40. 09-Apr-2012

    For Hearing & Final Disposal [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.B. Chaudhari

  41. 26-Mar-2012

    For Hearing & Final Disposal [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravi K. Deshpande

  42. 01-Mar-2012

    Private Paper Book Not Filed (Non Compliance)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravi K. Deshpande

  43. 14-Feb-2012

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravi K. DeshpandeView PDF

  44. 14-Feb-2012

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 07-Feb-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA/15/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRA 15/2012 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) dismissed the petitioner Mohammad Akil's challenge to an executing court's order that passed a final decree in a property partition suit, allowing respondent Smt. Rehana Khanam to execute her 1/6th share. The court held that while technically a formal final decree proceeding should follow a preliminary decree, the executing court's appointment of a commissioner and property division—done in compliance with the court's earlier writ petition directions—satisfied procedural requirements substantively, making the petitioner's objection merely technical and thus dismissible under Section 99 of the CPC. The court also rejected arguments that the respondent, as a decree transferee, lacked authority to execute without formal leave. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case