SHRI. VINOD S/O AWDHUTRAO KOKANE vs SAU.VARSHA W/O VINOD KOKANE (VARSHA D/O DADARAO DHULE) AND ANOTHER Advocate - SUMIT N. MULEY, (FOR R — WP/1358/2026

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 226,227. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.

Next hearing 30-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM040031602026

Filing Number

WP/2256/2026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

WP/1358/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 226,227
Code of Civil Procedure
C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI. VINOD S/O AWDHUTRAO KOKANE

    Adv. MANISH RAJENDRA JOHARAPURKAR,NITEEN KARWADE,NITEEN KARWADE, ,NITEEN KARWADE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAU.VARSHA W/O VINOD KOKANE (VARSHA D/O DADARAO DHULE) AND ANOTHER Advocate - SUMIT N. MULEY, (FOR R

  2. 2.,(FOR R

  3. 3.,AYUSHI DANGRE,ABHISHEK TRIPATHI,BHAVYA C. DHRUV

  4. 4.SHRI RUPESH S/O DHIRAJSINGH RAGHUVANSHI

Case History

  1. 30-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    For Admission-Matters Under CIVIL Procedure Code

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF

    Case Summary The writ petition was adjourned for two weeks at the request of respondent No.1's counsel. The court additionally directed that any adjournment requests submitted by the petitioner before the Family Court be considered favorably during the interim period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission-Matters Under CIVIL Procedure Code

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/1358/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The writ petition was adjourned for two weeks at the request of respondent No.1's counsel. The court additionally directed that any adjournment requests submitted by the petitioner before the Family Court be considered favorably during the interim period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case