RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., THR. BRANCH MANAGER, NAGPUR vs KAVITA PRAVIN SHAMBHARKAR AND OTHERS — FA/342/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040029202026
Filing Number
FA/2102/2026
Filing Date
28-Jan-2026
Registration No
FA/342/2026
Registration Date
14-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. Patil
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. Patil
Bench Type
Single
Category
COMPENSATION ( 7 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., THR. BRANCH MANAGER, NAGPUR
Adv. AMIT M. KUKDAY,VEDANT DEEPAK AKHADE,VEDANT DEEPAK AKHADE, ,VEDANT DEEPAK AKHADE
Respondent(s)
-
1.KAVITA PRAVIN SHAMBHARKAR AND OTHERS
Adv. KUNAL P. MIRACHE (FOR R/1 TO
-
2.1123
-
3.PRANOTI PRAVIN SHAMBHARKAR
-
4.KAVITA PRAVIN SHAMBHARKAR (MINOR) THR. NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER. KAVITA P. SHAMBHARKAR
-
5.SAVITRIBAI WD/O. GANGARAM SHAMBHARKAR
-
6.YOGESHBHAI KARSHARANDAS PATEL
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. PatilView PDF
Case Summary: In First Appeal No. 342/2026 before the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench), the court adjourned the matter to 08.07.2026. The court noted that notice to Respondent No. 5 had not been served and permitted the appellant (Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd) to serve Respondent No. 5 through all permissible modes of service in addition to regular service methods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Jun-2026
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade
-
28-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. FA/342/2026
Case Summary: In First Appeal No. 342/2026 before the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench), the court adjourned the matter to 08.07.2026. The court noted that notice to Respondent No. 5 had not been served and permitted the appellant (Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd) to serve Respondent No. 5 through all permissible modes of service in addition to regular service methods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts