SUDHAKAR S/O MAHADEO KAWALE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE AND FOREST DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND OTHERS — CAO/387/2022
Case under Other Act Section 05. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM040028042022
Filing Number
CAO/1838/2022
Filing Date
08-02-2022
Registration No
CAO/387/2022
Registration Date
02-06-2022
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ROHIT WASUDEO JOSHI
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ROHIT WASUDEO JOSHI
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUDHAKAR S/O MAHADEO KAWALE
Adv. SATISH RANGNATHRAO DESHPANDE
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE AND FOREST DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND OTHERS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ROHIT WASUDEO JOSHI
FOR ORDERS-
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | FOR ORDERS- |
Orders
The Bombay High Court's Nagpur Bench allowed Sudhakar Kawale's application for condonation of a 14-day delay in filing his miscellaneous application, accepting that his advocate's clerk was on leave due to his father's demise. The court set aside the Registrar's January 2020 order refusing registration of the Civil Revision Application and extended the time to remove office objections until April 30, 2026, after which the revision application would be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court's Nagpur Bench allowed Sudhakar Kawale's application for condonation of a 14-day delay in filing his miscellaneous application, accepting that his advocate's clerk was on leave due to his father's demise. The court set aside the Registrar's January 2020 order refusing registration of the Civil Revision Application and extended the time to remove office objections until April 30, 2026, after which the revision application would be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts