UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., THR. ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, NAGPUR vs SMT. ARCHANA WD/O NAGORAO BANSINGE AND OTHERS Advocate - SANDEEP L. SHARMA — CAF/1143/2026
Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: --PARTLY ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040026062026
Filing Number
CAF/1912/2026
Filing Date
23-Jan-2026
Registration No
CAF/1143/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., THR. ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, NAGPUR
Adv. CECIL A ANTHONY
Respondent(s)
-
1.SMT. ARCHANA WD/O NAGORAO BANSINGE AND OTHERS Advocate - SANDEEP L. SHARMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Yanshivraj Gopichand KhobragadeView PDF
Case Summary: CAF/1143/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) partially allowed the withdrawal application by claimants in a motor accident compensation case. The court permitted the deceased's wife and adult daughter to withdraw 75% of their compensation share (from a total Rs. 60,02,019/- award) upon furnishing undertakings to the Registrar, while protecting the interests of two minor sons by restricting their share withdrawal. The decision safeguarded minors' legal protections while allowing adult beneficiaries access to their compensation funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
—
-
23-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CAF/1143/2026
Case Summary: CAF/1143/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) partially allowed the withdrawal application by claimants in a motor accident compensation case. The court permitted the deceased's wife and adult daughter to withdraw 75% of their compensation share (from a total Rs. 60,02,019/- award) upon furnishing undertakings to the Registrar, while protecting the interests of two minor sons by restricting their share withdrawal. The decision safeguarded minors' legal protections while allowing adult beneficiaries access to their compensation funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts