RAMPRASAD S/O ARJUNRAO NITNAWARE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS, RISOD, DIST. WASHIM — APPP/206/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc). Disposed: --Disposed-Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 04-Feb-2026

CNR: HCBM040024482026

Filing Number

APPP/639/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

APPP/206/2026

Registration Date

23-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed-Off

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMPRASAD S/O ARJUNRAO NITNAWARE

    Adv. ABHISHEK SANJAY KASHTE,AVINASH R. DESHPANDE,AVINASH R. DESHPANDE, ,P. M. PANDE,AVINASH R. DESHPANDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS (Police Station), RISOD, DIST. WASHIM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

    Case Summary: Ramprasad S/O Arjunrao Nitnaware v. State of Maharashtra Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) GRANTED BAIL to the applicant despite serious misappropriation allegations totaling Rs. 7+ crores. The court found insufficient documentary evidence connecting the applicant to the alleged fraud and noted the investigation was complete with only documentary evidence involved. Key Reasoning: While acknowledging serious allegations of purchasing foodgrains in the company's name without payment (issuing dishonored cheques to farmers), the court found the prosecution's case weak. The only concrete evidence was Rs. 92 lakhs in the applicant's personal account; no trader statements confirmed cash payments to him, and allegations regarding fictitious vouchers lacked supporting documentation. With the charge sheet filed and the applicant imprisoned for 10 months, continued custody was deemed unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Feb-2026

    —

  4. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APPP/206/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Ramprasad S/O Arjunrao Nitnaware v. State of Maharashtra Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) GRANTED BAIL to the applicant despite serious misappropriation allegations totaling Rs. 7+ crores. The court found insufficient documentary evidence connecting the applicant to the alleged fraud and noted the investigation was complete with only documentary evidence involved. Key Reasoning: While acknowledging serious allegations of purchasing foodgrains in the company's name without payment (issuing dishonored cheques to farmers), the court found the prosecution's case weak. The only concrete evidence was Rs. 92 lakhs in the applicant's personal account; no trader statements confirmed cash payments to him, and allegations regarding fictitious vouchers lacked supporting documentation. With the charge sheet filed and the applicant imprisoned for 10 months, continued custody was deemed unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case