RAMPRASAD S/O ARJUNRAO NITNAWARE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS, RISOD, DIST. WASHIM — BA/83/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 439. Disposed: Contested--Disposed-Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 28-Jan-2026

CNR: HCBM040024472026

Filing Number

BA/638/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

BA/83/2026

Registration Date

23-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

BAIL/INTERIM BAIL ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed-Off

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 439
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 406,409,420,465,468,471R/W34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMPRASAD S/O ARJUNRAO NITNAWARE

    Adv. ABHISHEK SANJAY KASHTE,AVINASH R. DESHPANDE,AVINASH R. DESHPANDE, ,P. M. PANDE,AVINASH R. DESHPANDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS (Police Station), RISOD, DIST. WASHIM

    Adv. ,SANGRAM VIKAS SIRPURKAR,DR. RENUKA SANGRAM SIRPURKAR,DHRUV SANGRAM SIRPURKAR,ADV. FOR ASSIST TO PROSECUTION 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

    Case Summary: BA/83/2026 The Nagpur High Court granted bail to Ramprasad S/O Arjunrao Nitnaware, CEO of a food grain company, accused of misappropriating Rs. 7+ crores. While serious allegations existed—including issuing dishonoured cheques to farmers and creating fictitious vouchers—the court found insufficient documentary evidence linking him to the alleged Rs. 7.82 crore loss, with only Rs. 92 lakhs traceable to his personal account. Since investigation was complete, all documents collected, and the case involved documentary evidence, further custody was unnecessary; the applicant was released on bail with conditions including a Rs. 50,000 bond, attendance at trial, and restrictions on contacting witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Ba (After Notice)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    Ba (After Notice)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  6. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

  7. 20-Apr-2026

    Ba (After Notice)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  8. 17-Apr-2026

    Ba (After Notice)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  9. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

  10. 15-Apr-2026

    Ba (After Notice)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  11. 27-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

  12. 27-Mar-2026

    Ba (After Notice)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  13. 18-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

  14. 18-Mar-2026

    Ba (After Notice)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  15. 12-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

  16. 12-Mar-2026

    Ba (After Notice)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  17. 05-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

  18. 05-Mar-2026

    Ba (After Notice)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  19. 24-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

  20. 24-Feb-2026

    Ba (After Notice)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  21. 10-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

  22. 10-Feb-2026

    Ba (Fresh)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

  23. 28-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 27-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

  25. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA/83/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: BA/83/2026 The Nagpur High Court granted bail to Ramprasad S/O Arjunrao Nitnaware, CEO of a food grain company, accused of misappropriating Rs. 7+ crores. While serious allegations existed—including issuing dishonoured cheques to farmers and creating fictitious vouchers—the court found insufficient documentary evidence linking him to the alleged Rs. 7.82 crore loss, with only Rs. 92 lakhs traceable to his personal account. Since investigation was complete, all documents collected, and the case involved documentary evidence, further custody was unnecessary; the applicant was released on bail with conditions including a Rs. 50,000 bond, attendance at trial, and restrictions on contacting witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case