GUJRAT AMBUJA CEMENT LTD., (MARATHA CEMENT WORKS) THR. CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY vs MAHADEO KRUSHNA @ KISANA BALKI AND ANOTHER Advocate - KIRTI SATPUTE, (CROSS OBJECTOR FOR / R 1A TO R 1F) 1. — HCBM40020672026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 41 RULE 22.

CNR: HCBM040020672026

Filing Number

XOB/1551/2026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Judge

Registrar (Judicial)

Coram

Registrar (Judicial)

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 41 RULE 22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GUJRAT AMBUJA CEMENT LTD., (MARATHA CEMENT WORKS) THR. CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY

    Adv. H.A. DESHPANDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHADEO KRUSHNA @ KISANA BALKI AND ANOTHER Advocate - KIRTI SATPUTE, (CROSS OBJECTOR FOR / R 1A TO R 1F) 1.

  2. 2.KANTABAI MAHADEO BALKI1.

  3. 3.SHAKUNTALA VASANT KALE1.

  4. 4.ALKA RAJESH DAWARE1.

  5. 5.GOPIKA PREMNATH PARSUTKAR1.

  6. 6.SUREKHA VINOD LANDE1.

  7. 7.SAMADHAN MAHADEO BALKI

  8. 8.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. COLLECTOR, CHANDRAPUR

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    For Orders -

    Registrar (Judicial)

  2. 05-May-2026

    Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

    The case (Cross Objection Stamp No. 1551 of 2026 in First Appeal 1273 of 2025) before the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur between Gujarat Ambuja Cement Ltd. and Mahadeo Krushna @ Kisana Balki was stood over after vacation on 5th May, 2026. No substantive order was passed; the matter was adjourned for further hearing post-vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    For Orders -

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The case (Cross Objection Stamp No. 1551 of 2026 in First Appeal 1273 of 2025) before the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur between Gujarat Ambuja Cement Ltd. and Mahadeo Krushna @ Kisana Balki was stood over after vacation on 5th May, 2026. No substantive order was passed; the matter was adjourned for further hearing post-vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case