GULSHAN S/O PRAKASH TIDKE vs PRANITA W/O GULSHAN TIDKE Advocate - PRASHANT N. SANGIDWAR — CAO/111/2026

Case under Limitation Act,1963 Section 05. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040016882026

Filing Number

CAO/1268/2026

Filing Date

17-Jan-2026

Registration No

CAO/111/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande

Coram

Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act,1963 Section 05

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GULSHAN S/O PRAKASH TIDKE

    Adv. R. N. BORWANKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRANITA W/O GULSHAN TIDKE Advocate - PRASHANT N. SANGIDWAR

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    For Orders - Matrimonial Matters

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar,hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao DeshpandeView PDF

    Case Summary: In Civil Application No. 111 of 2026, the High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) heard appellant Gulshan Prakash Tidke's appeal against respondent Pranita w/o Gulshan Tidke. The Court issued notice to the respondent returnable on 12/06/2026 and directed the appellant to serve the respondent through any private mode available in law in addition to usual service methods. The case is adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAO/111/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Civil Application No. 111 of 2026, the High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) heard appellant Gulshan Prakash Tidke's appeal against respondent Pranita w/o Gulshan Tidke. The Court issued notice to the respondent returnable on 12/06/2026 and directed the appellant to serve the respondent through any private mode available in law in addition to usual service methods. The case is adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case