SMT. DHANASHREE PRAKASH BADDILWAR AND ORS. vs KALAWATI NITIN GHATE AND ANOTHER — WP/2429/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM040014792026
Filing Number
WP/1104/2026
Filing Date
15-Jan-2026
Registration No
WP/2429/2026
Registration Date
23-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 08-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. DHANASHREE PRAKASH BADDILWAR AND ORS.
Adv. A.M. CHANDEKAR,RUSHIKESH RAVINDRA MADDALWAR,RUSHIKESH RAVINDRA MADDALWAR, ,RUSHIKESH R. MAHAJAN,SMITA SHIVKUMAR OSWAL,SANDEEP NARESH SINGH,RUPERI C. MESHRAM,RUSHIKESH RAVINDRA MADDALWAR
-
2.MAKARAND BADDILWAR
-
3.KU. PAYAL PRAKASH BADDILWAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.KALAWATI NITIN GHATE AND ANOTHER
-
2.DEVRAO BAPURAO GHATE
Case History
-
20-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-Apr-2026
Fresh Admission-Matters Under CIVIL Procedure Code
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
-
02-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF
Summary: Writ Petition No. 2429 of 2026 filed by Smt. Dhanashree Prakash Baddilwar and others against Kalawati Nitin Ghate was heard before Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar at the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court. Notice was issued to the respondents, returnable after three weeks, and the petitioners were permitted to serve respondents through private mode in addition to regular service, with an affidavit of service to be filed by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2429/2026
Summary: Writ Petition No. 2429 of 2026 filed by Smt. Dhanashree Prakash Baddilwar and others against Kalawati Nitin Ghate was heard before Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar at the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court. Notice was issued to the respondents, returnable after three weeks, and the petitioners were permitted to serve respondents through private mode in addition to regular service, with an affidavit of service to be filed by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts