KANHAIYALAL S/O SHIVPRATAP MANDHANA vs GOPAL S/O GANESHRAM LADDHA AND ANOTHER — WP/4452/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040014672026

Filing Number

WP/1092/2026

Filing Date

15-Jan-2026

Registration No

WP/4452/2026

Registration Date

01-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KANHAIYALAL S/O SHIVPRATAP MANDHANA

    Adv. CHANDIRAM F. BHAGWANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOPAL S/O GANESHRAM LADDHA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.SHRI GIRDHAR S/O RAMPPRASAD LADDHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Jun-2026

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo JoshiView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) dismissed the writ petition filed by Kanhaiyalal challenging the lower court's order that had condoned a 36-day delay in filing a regular civil appeal. The court upheld the lower court's discretion, finding the delay minimal and the respondent's explanation of Covid-19-related financial hardship reasonable, as first appeal is a valuable statutory right warranting such condonation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4452/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) dismissed the writ petition filed by Kanhaiyalal challenging the lower court's order that had condoned a 36-day delay in filing a regular civil appeal. The court upheld the lower court's discretion, finding the delay minimal and the respondent's explanation of Covid-19-related financial hardship reasonable, as first appeal is a valuable statutory right warranting such condonation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case