KANHAIYALAL S/O SHIVPRATAP MANDHANA vs GOPAL S/O GANESHRAM LADDHA AND ANOTHER — WP/4452/2026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040014672026
Filing Number
WP/1092/2026
Filing Date
15-Jan-2026
Registration No
WP/4452/2026
Registration Date
01-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KANHAIYALAL S/O SHIVPRATAP MANDHANA
Adv. CHANDIRAM F. BHAGWANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOPAL S/O GANESHRAM LADDHA AND ANOTHER
-
2.SHRI GIRDHAR S/O RAMPPRASAD LADDHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Jun-2026
—
-
08-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo JoshiView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) dismissed the writ petition filed by Kanhaiyalal challenging the lower court's order that had condoned a 36-day delay in filing a regular civil appeal. The court upheld the lower court's discretion, finding the delay minimal and the respondent's explanation of Covid-19-related financial hardship reasonable, as first appeal is a valuable statutory right warranting such condonation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4452/2026
The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) dismissed the writ petition filed by Kanhaiyalal challenging the lower court's order that had condoned a 36-day delay in filing a regular civil appeal. The court upheld the lower court's discretion, finding the delay minimal and the respondent's explanation of Covid-19-related financial hardship reasonable, as first appeal is a valuable statutory right warranting such condonation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts